Re: libstdc++2.8 is missing from slink
On Mon, 21 Sep 1998, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
jgg>I've just been told that libstdc++2.8 is missing from slink, it seems to
jgg>me that this is a rather massive oversight as alot of packages are still
jgg>linked against libstdc++2.8, not 2.9..
I just looked all over on master. It seems you are correct. I
remember seeing something to the effect that we should recompile things
that need libstdc++ . But I guess this means a lot of slink is currently
broken.
John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.arizona.edu>
Tucson,AZ http://www.physics.arizona.edu/~lapeyre
Reply to: