I have just updated blt4.2, and released a new package blt8.0. Both contain upstream BLT2.4f... blt4.2 contains BLT2.4f compiled and linked against tk4.2 blt8.0 contains BLT2.4f compiled and linked against tk8.0 They should (and currently do) provide a libBLT.so.2.4, and thus cannot both be installed simultaneously. This is, I believe, inconvenient, as it is quite possible (and likely) to have executables linked to either. I could give one a different so number, but that would mean autoconfig scripts would be confused at so numbers which were not the ones expected. I could change the name of one, but again this would be confusing for both people and autoconfig scripts (and makefiles). Currently I have made them conflict with each other. Is their a better solution? G. -- Gordon Russell http://www.dcs.napier.ac.uk/~gor PGP Public Key - http://www.dcs.napier.ac.uk/~gor/pgpkey.txt
Attachment:
pgpxZG_1tSJAh.pgp
Description: PGP signature