Re: Debian popularity.

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Debian popularity.
From: Guy Maor <maor@debian.org>
Date: 03 Sep 1998 01:04:33 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87pvddfwq6.fsf@femto.dyn.ml.org>
In-reply-to: Tommi Virtanen's message of "Wed, 2 Sep 1998 13:46:17 +0300"
References: <[🔎] 19980902025140.F4251@sarge.novare.net> <[🔎] 19980901203351.A22169@wiggy.ml.org> <[🔎] 19980902134617.A2656@hq.yok.utu.fi>

Tommi Virtanen <tv@debian.org> writes:

> 			sucks, is lousy	rules, rocks, is great
> 	Debian		0		668

Haha, I wonder if the way we name our package makefiles has something
to do with this?


Guy

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Debian popularity.
  - From: John Lapeyre <lapeyre@physics.Arizona.EDU>
- Re: Debian popularity.
  - From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@efis.ucr.ac.cr>

References:
- Debian popularity.
  - From: Ean Schuessler <ean@sarge.novare.net>
- Re: Debian popularity.
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@debian.org>
- Re: Debian popularity.
  - From: Tommi Virtanen <tv@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: PAM still a goal for slink?
Next by Date: Re: -ltermcap option...
Previous by thread: Re: Debian popularity.
Next by thread: Re: Debian popularity.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread