Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
On Thu, 27 Aug 1998 14:09:56 +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
>On Wed, Aug 26, 1998 at 08:46:25AM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
>> What happens when joe blow realizes that s/\./r/ and he gets the same
>> thing? Do you change numbering again?
>>
>> It comes down to hiding and being deceitful without solving anything
>> because every few years you end up "revising" how you "represent" a
>> "revision."
>>
>> When they learn, what do you do then?
>Teach them why it is so.
I know I said the previous message would be my last post but I started
going back and hit this one. This is exactly my point. *TEACHING* them is a
better answer than *FOOLING* them. So why not *TEACH* them that 2.0.1 is
just a small revision to the 2.0 release instead of *FOOLING* them?
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reply to: