Re: Naming of new 2.0 release
On Tue, 25 Aug 1998 23:35:38 -0500 (CDT), Nathan E Norman wrote:
>Have you read the freakin archives? I'd guess not.
No, and I'm not going to. I stated up top: Why rehash it? Because it
is wrong. I stated why I felt it was wrong. I'll continue to back it up as
needed. For example, in every other business if a vendor over orders
something it is their problem, but in this one it is our problem. No, wrong.
In every business vendors have to deal with stale stock, this one is no
different. Changing a . to a r will not make a difference in the long run
other than to perpetuate a bad version scheme in place of a good one.
--
Steve C. Lamb | Opinions expressed by me are not my
http://www.calweb.com/~morpheus | employer's. They hired me for my
ICQ: 5107343 | skills and labor, not my opinions!
---------------------------------------+-------------------------------------
Reply to: