[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Naming of new 2.0 release



[ Please don't Cc: public replies to me. ]

Philip Hands:
> There seem to be only two positions on this subject:
> 
>   1)  There is no useful difference between 2.0.1 and 2.0 r1
>   2)  It would be better to have 2.0 r? for marketing reasons

I have failed to communicate clearly. I have third opinion:

    3)  The CD must be clearly labeled as to which release it contains.
        If two CD's are both labeled as 2.0 and both contain different
	versions, then the customer is being screwed.

Attachment: pgpQ6mWBt2dho.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: