On Fri, Aug 14, 1998 at 01:03:46PM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > Hi, > >>"Michael" == Michael Bramer <michael@weh.rwth-aachen.de> writes: > > Michael> It is not acceptable, that a official announce debian-redhat > Michael> projekt produce non-free software! > > Sheer Hyprocrisy. It si OK to have the DFSG which is non-free > (no license to redistribute that I can see); it is OK to have most of > our software depend on a license that itself is non-free (taken a > look at the GPL lately?), but it is not OK for the LCS? How do you > justify that? We follow the FSSTND, which is also non-free. Explain > that one. no problem: It is software. Not a text, not a document, not a lowr, not a standard. It is nice, if we can change the contens of a standard and redistribute it (with a new name). But software from a debian maintainer in debian projekt must be DFSG free! Grisu -- Michael Bramer - a Debian Certified Linux Developer http://www.debian.org PGP: finger grisu@master.debian.org -- Linux Sysadmin -- Use Debian Linux "He who says disk space is free, thinks money grows on directory tree."
Attachment:
pgpkPgHx6rNvE.pgp
Description: PGP signature