Re: Copyright from the lcs-projekt!? [dwarf@polaris.net: Re: First cut at testing and validation]
On 14 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
> >>"Michael" == Michael Bramer <michael@weh.rwth-aachen.de> writes:
>
> Michael> It is not acceptable, that a official announce debian-redhat
> Michael> projekt produce non-free software!
>
> Sheer Hyprocrisy. It si OK to have the DFSG which is non-free
> (no license to redistribute that I can see); it is OK to have most of
> our software depend on a license that itself is non-free (taken a
> look at the GPL lately?), but it is not OK for the LCS? How do you
> justify that? We follow the FSSTND, which is also non-free. Explain
> that one.
>
As you have pointed out on -policy, software is not the same as a
standard. We are talking here about the LCS validation suite, which is a
piece of software..
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
Reply to: