Thus spake Jules Bean (jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk): > It also fails point #1 - Free Redistribution > > > In my opinion, this one goes in non-free... > > I suggest the John points the author at the DFSG and suggests a slight > weakening of this... I don't wanna be anti-Debian, or classed as such.. but there has to be a point where we seriously have to look at a company or a code and say flat out "These people don't WANT it to be included in Debian." Please recall that we qualify licenses for the DFSG, NOT the reverse. We don't need to be forcing licenses under DFSG when the original intent of the author is clearly stated in those licenses. Got it? Jarrod
Attachment:
pgpocRFz2nq1O.pgp
Description: PGP signature