Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh

To: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 14:51:35 +0200 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980804144744.10848A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Lots of scripts use "ps", but procps is not essential.

Please, Luis or Manoj, answer to my previous question:
Why do you talk about "implied promises" in the case of bash and not in
the case of ps?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1

iQCVAgUBNccDyiqK7IlOjMLFAQHfMgP/TCut22jmL1cf95m7A+ObO6Z8wYpRM4fT
sTFTgB6MHnkjREcZpCP6DKmbc5YxLbzu2T0WwWW982GT5KJD2I25EaIzP/Vf8jMC
UG7ghFuyKybuBOya5kJZDD3ddwj0c/huYtBTHzeScqE4F0QJEtxKe+f8HO6WIXKy
Z+pw0Rcr9nk=
=2MpH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
  - From: Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@datasync.com>

Prev by Date: AAAAAAAAARRRRGGHHHHH! bind fuckups
Next by Date: Re: WOW! See World Record Sex!!!
Previous by thread: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
Next by thread: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread