Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh

To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>
Cc: Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Aug 1998 15:21:54 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980802152154.10187@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>, Debian Developers <debian-devel@lists.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980802210507.1038A-100000@cantor.unex.es>; from Santiago Vila on Sun, Aug 02, 1998 at 09:10:36PM +0200
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980802210507.1038A-100000@cantor.unex.es>

On 2 Aug 1998, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > 	What do we gain by demoting bash from essential to required?

Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es> wrote:
> The freedom to remove it from one's system, of course.

As Scott K. Ellis has just pointed out:
	dpkg --purge --force-remove-essential bash

Note that you even have the freedom to remove ldso, should you
choose to exercise it.

-- 
Raul



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

References:
- Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@unex.es>

Prev by Date: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
Next by Date: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
Previous by thread: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
Next by thread: Re: POSIX shell; bash ash pdksh & /bin/sh
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread