[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#25189: marked as done (ftp site reorganisation breaks production server support)



Your message dated 30 Jul 1998 03:28:55 -0700
with message-id <87af5reioo.fsf@femto.dyn.ml.org>
and subject line Processed: Re: Bug#25189: ftp site reorganisation breaks production server support
has caused the attached bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I'm
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Ian Jackson
(administrator, Debian bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 1998 01:28:54 +0000
Received: (qmail 6758 invoked from network); 30 Jul 1998 01:28:50 -0000
Received: from stpeter.condor.com.au (HELO relay.condor.com.au) (root@203.2.225.133)
  by debian.novare.net with SMTP; 30 Jul 1998 01:28:50 -0000
Received: from mail.condor.com.au (mail.condor.com.au [203.2.225.99])
	by relay.condor.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA16449
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 1998 09:28:38 +0800
Received: from boingy (sjm@ip026.condor.com.au [203.2.225.26])
	by mail.condor.com.au (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA28914
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 30 Jul 1998 09:28:36 +0800 (WST)
Message-ID: <0cd001bdbb59$5f3bf410$1ae102cb@boingy.condor.com.au>
From: "Simon Mackinlay" <sjm@condor.com.au>
To: <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: ftp site reorganisation breaks production server support
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 1998 09:28:34 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3


The transitioning of debian-1.3 from your archives has led to an
extremely difficult position, commercially; Servers in production
environments *cannot* afford either the downtime or the consulting
dollars necessary to upgrade from a stable platform, for little or
no tangible gain.

Removing the stable distribution without advance warning has left
vendors providing support for these systems caught between a rock
and a hard place; we can no longer maintain said systems, as the
necessary packages are no longer available.

Could you *please* put this distribution back online, and in future
provide *at least* six months warning before deleting distributions
wholesale from your archive?

Also, as a debian-sparc enthusiast, I'd like to illustrate that
this distribution is now totally broken, again due to renaming the
underlying distribution; a little consultation here would've gone
a long way.

In frustration...

Simon

-- 
you might be gone before you know, so live like there's no tomorrow

                        sjm@condor.com.au



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: