Re: what about delaying hamm release
> >> Is there a version a few versions back that would be OK to use ?
> >> If so, I suggest we back out the last few changes.
> >
> > What about 3.3.2.2-1. At least it has no problems on new installs.
> > (It probably had security problems though).
> >
> > Alex Y.
>
> I'd vote for the one immediately before that. There is a bug in the
> upstream source affecting at least a numberr of PCI-based laptops,
> resulting in a bus error.
Also, I forgot that 3.3.2.2-1 had incorrect symlink which made XF86Setup
unable to start.
So, do we have a "stable" candidate?
Alex Y.
--
_
_( )_
( (o___ +-------------------------------------------+
| _ 7 | Alexander Yukhimets |
\ (") | http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/ |
/ \ \ +-------------------------------------------+
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: