[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: what about delaying hamm release



> >> Is there a version a few versions back that would be OK to use ?
> >> If so, I suggest we back out the last few changes.
> > 
> > What about 3.3.2.2-1. At least it has no problems on new installs.
> > (It probably had security problems though).
> > 
> > Alex Y.
> 
> I'd vote for the one immediately before that.  There is a bug in the
> upstream source affecting at least a numberr of PCI-based laptops,
> resulting in a bus error.  

Also, I forgot that 3.3.2.2-1 had incorrect symlink which made XF86Setup
unable to start.

So, do we have a "stable" candidate?

Alex Y.
-- 
   _ 
 _( )_
(     (o___           +-------------------------------------------+
 |      _ 7           |            Alexander Yukhimets            |
  \    (")            |       http://pages.nyu.edu/~aqy6633/      |
  /     \ \           +-------------------------------------------+


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: