Re: Should we ship KDE in hamm?
Philip Hands wrote:
>
> Stephan Kulow <coolo@kde.org> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Most of the things, Francesco listed, are simply misdocumentations and
> > should be fixed for making the copyright issue more clear. I don't want
> > to go into the details here, but you're right, that
> >
> > 1. the hamm packages leak some documentation about the whole copyright
> > issue
> > 2. the hamm packages are about three months in behind of the development
> >
> > While 2. is true, I would consider it a good option for debian CD users
> > to have a test field, so they can learn about KDE and try a newer version
> > laster. If 1. is a problem for you, feel free to remove them.
>
> If it's true that the versions of packages in hamm are significantly behind
> the ones in slink (enough so that we'd be better off encouraging people to go
> straight to the slink versions), then that gives a technical justification for
> pulling the packages, and I think we should do it.
>
> [Stephan, could you give us an idea of how the hamm and slink packages compare]
>
Well, there are a lot of bugs fixed, but I can't give you a list.
Greetings, Stephan
--
OLD NAME: Stephan Kulow
NEW ADDRESS: Kleine Altef(ae)hre 11 / 23552 L(ue)beck
NEW NUMBER: 49-451-7060735
OLD EMAIL: coolo@kde.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: