Re: Status of qmail?
--On Tue, Jul 14, 1998 5:59 pm -0500 "Rob Browning" <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
wrote:
> David Frey <david@eos.lugs.ch> writes:
>
>> I'd prefer exim as our default MTA -- it is easy to configure and
>> mostly compatible with smail.
>
> I thought that last time this was discussed, we had more or less
> decided to move toward exim, presuming we could satisfy a couple of
> concerns people had had with particular issues (was it uucp?).
FWIW, I would also put my vote behind exim. I don't understand procmail
issues (raised in another message on this thread) since I've never used it,
but exim has a nice simple filtering interface, and a very powerful
multi-domain interface.....
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | jules@debian.org | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| Debian GNU/Linux - "Microsoft *does* have a year 2000 problem - |
| and we're it!" (paraphrased from IRC) |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: