[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Status of qmail?



--On Tue, Jul 14, 1998 5:59 pm -0500 "Rob Browning" <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
wrote: 

> David Frey <david@eos.lugs.ch> writes:
> 
>> I'd prefer exim as our default MTA -- it is easy to configure and
>> mostly compatible with smail.
> 
> I thought that last time this was discussed, we had more or less
> decided to move toward exim, presuming we could satisfy a couple of
> concerns people had had with particular issues (was it uucp?).

FWIW, I would also put my vote behind exim.  I don't understand procmail
issues (raised in another message on this thread) since I've never used it,
but exim has a nice simple filtering interface, and a very powerful
multi-domain interface.....

Jules


/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
|  Jelibean aka  | jules@jellybean.co.uk         |  6 Evelyn Rd        |
|  Jules aka     | jules@debian.org              |  Richmond, Surrey   |
|  Julian Bean   | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk        |  TW9 2TF *UK*       |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
|  Debian GNU/Linux - "Microsoft *does* have a year 2000 problem -     |
|                      and we're it!" (paraphrased from IRC)           |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/



--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org


Reply to: