Previously Branden Robinson wrote: > Well, I'd say that "second" overrides "first". Because it's a security > bug, it's a bug in general. And security bugs are always of severity > important or greater. Brian doesn't seem to agree with that, since he downgraded a bunch of bugs about insecure handling of files in /tmp. On the other hand, leaving a socket open is evil and can lead to nasty attack (I know, a friend of mine wrote a couple). > See 22878. The guy forgot to include his config information. The two bugs > are merged for that reason. The current script doesn't report merged bugs, it just skips the other bugs it's merged with. I'll try to add a list of merged bugs tomorrow (should be quite easy). > That, I don't understand. Incompatibility between GNU tar and Sun tar?? Sun tar (and other tar's, like HP and IRIX) don't support all files created with GNU tar, so that probably is a correct deduction. Wichert. -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: wakkerma@wi.LeidenUniv.nl WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
Attachment:
pgpVViThlq080.pgp
Description: PGP signature