-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Wed, 8 Jul 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
>> package into contrib. However, splay itself doesn't require this. At
>> some point in the future it might well be worth it to split splay and
>> xsplay so that splay can go into main."
>
>Until this is done every package that depends on splay has to go into
>contrib, too. I'm sorry.
Would it be helpful to you folks if I just finally split the
packages now (I maintain splay)? I'd been previously holding out
until someone could tell me what the plan was for FHS conversion and I
got a free moment, but I figure I could do it over next weekend if
someone wants to set up a dependency, but if the other maintainer is
including his own binary, it might be more prudent to wait.
>Please try to convince the x?splay maintainer to split the package
>and/or (no or, only and) the x?splay author to use a free widget set.
What widget set is usually recommended as a replacement?
=============================================================================
Zed Pobre <zed@va.debian.org> | PGP key on servers, fingerprint on finger
=============================================================================
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBNaMl6dwPDK/EqFJbAQFqqAf9Gqho+RjaiFunT01i+V5kvLI5qW6cRhYc
KyGHRiPmGVgFvoO2lt9WS2BPvkDEHssmge6plJwUOpZuip0/yeJG5SQbzGWqmM1s
GoWjbNEbaB3egSc8ha85cj8+72U1l62Ui6wLi7VInipzuAXjAtRhWXggYDCfEC1A
4oPmIlrNcbNKI49Mpsbsec1dVQgXdqu9vgRFErCuaPsWO/mRNqAtYSZunjEChLqk
hFCs5SqAjHgSeuB1qMFoELSpXZjbhvGXtGjbPivFwcQpUeKI8JDNkKqC428GYVkP
ugOZEaAAOs9+4VLoXBYcRX4giDusa/3Qlm9X9pqacnZP5xh8QWzCag==
=/cqz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org