Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful

To: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>, Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
Cc: Ruud de Rooij <r.c.m.derooij@twi.tudelft.nl>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 1998 23:50:49 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980705235049.N786@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>, Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>, Ruud de Rooij <r.c.m.derooij@twi.tudelft.nl>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980705233522.180A-100000@dwarf.polaris.net>; from Dale Scheetz on Sun, Jul 05, 1998 at 11:40:22PM -0400
References: <[🔎] 1413.899686404@hands.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980705233522.180A-100000@dwarf.polaris.net>

Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net> wrote:
> While I agree, the current management of the archives makes this quite
> difficult, as there isn't sufficient archive space to keep every old
> version of every package, which is the only way to be "absolutely"
> safe.

Can't we get more archive space?

And, can't we mark less-desirable versions for discarding?

-- 
Raul


--  
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful
  - From: Philip Hands <phil@hands.com>
- Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful
  - From: Dale Scheetz <dwarf@polaris.net>

Prev by Date: Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful
Next by Date: Re: static libs
Previous by thread: Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful
Next by thread: Re: libc6_2.0.7r-3 considered harmful
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread