Previously peloy@ven.ra.rockwell.com wrote: > Wichert Akkerman <wakkerma@wiggy.ml.org> wrote: > > The scripts indeed checks for presence in other architectures. Since > > alpha apparently is going to make it for hamm, it might be a good idea > > to remove alpha from the list of scanned architectures? > > Well, I don't quite understand: if Hamm for Alpha will make it then I > think we want to know what bugs are stopping the release. Oops.. I forgot a `not' in there. According to our fearless release-manager Alpha will not make a hamm release. Wichert. -- ============================================================================== This combination of bytes forms a message written to you by Wichert Akkerman. E-Mail: wakkerma@wi.LeidenUniv.nl WWW: http://www.wi.leidenuniv.nl/~wichert/
Attachment:
pgpv9vZXHxWfX.pgp
Description: PGP signature