- To: email@example.com
- Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
- Subject: Re: GNUnification
- From: tb@MIT.EDU (Thomas Bushnell, n/BSG)
- Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 12:03:40 -0400
- Message-id: <199807011603.MAA21924@steve-dallas.MIT.EDU>
- In-reply-to: Matthew Wilcox's message of Wed, 1 Jul 1998 16:50:06 +0100 (BST) <199807011550.QAA27242@odie.barnet.ac.uk>
From: Matthew Wilcox <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 1998 16:50:06 +0100 (BST)
Sounds plausible. Linux has msdosfs which lets you look at DOS
filesystems. There's also a vfat filesystem to support win95 filenames.
Then there's UMSDOS which has the intention of allowing one to install
without repartitioning one's hard disc. UMSDOS contains support for
things like symlinks which msdosfs does not hence the confusion.
Ah, I only intended to do the msdosfs/vfatfs thing.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org