Re: xterminal alternatives.
From: Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org>
Subject: Re: xterminal alternatives.
Date: 30 Jun 1998 15:08:40 -0700
Message-ID: <[🔎] ytt67hio847.fsf@gilgamesh.cse.ucsc.edu>
che> >>>>> "Rob" == Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> writes:
che>
che> Rob> Ben Gertzfield <che@debian.org> writes:
che> >> If we use update-alternatives, we'll have an easy way to set
che> >> the default X terminal program in the future. I like that idea
che> >> a lot more than forcing the user to add entries to a text file.
che>
che> Rob> The only difficulty with update-alternatives is that it can't
che> Rob> be used per-user. Can the other scheme? Do we care?
che>
che> Hmm, good point. I would think we don't care; there's no way to change
che> the menus files per-user, either.
Not to make x-terminal alternatives is nothing to do with the menu system.
We can select any X terminal program by writing in menu.h even if making
x-terminal alternatives.
----
Masato Taruishi <taruis-m@jed.uec.ac.jp> | University of Electro Comunications
<taru@debian.or.jp> | Department of Computer Science
<taruisma@sunicom.co.jp> | Junior
http://www.sunicom.co.jp/~taruisma/ | Shiroi Town Chiba Pref, JAPAN
Key fingerprint = 49 46 74 E1 8D D1 EB 56 8D CA 2A 20 14 9E A9 25
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: