Re: libc6_2.0.7 release notes...
Dale Scheetz writes:
> > > I like Santiago's suggestion better:
> > >
> > > 2.0.8pre1 => 2.0.7.99.1
> > > 2.0.8pre2 => 2.0.7.99.2
> > > :
> > > 2.0.8 => 2.0.8
> > >
> > > Which scales properly and solves the problem.
> >
> > Mmm, well, this was actually suggested by Vincent Renardias, but yes, I
> > also like this proposal :-). I used a similar approach for procmail and
> > smartlist (only similar, because I don't have a "99"), with a
> > clarification about the version number in the extended description.
Well, it is know solution, but with a disavantage: we don't use
upstream version number...
--
Yann Dirson <ydirson@mygale.org> | Stop making M$-Bill richer & richer,
isp-email: <ydirson@a2points.com> | support Debian GNU/Linux:
debian-email: <dirson@debian.org> | more powerful, more stable !
http://www.mygale.org/~ydirson/ | Check <http://www.debian.org/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: