Re: RFC: The BTS, "Severity: Fixed", etc. (Was: An idea for the BTS)
Yann Dirson <ydirson@mygale.org> writes:
> [Note: I don't know much about the internals of the BTS; I hope this
> will be accurate enough, though]
>
> * These fields would be named by the codename of the dist
> (eg. `hamm_status') - can this be achieved easily ?
Why not just go with something more heirarchical like:
Status: (hamm fixed) (bo known-workaround)
etc. That way we don't have a potentially ever growing number of
fields, just field contents...
--
Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu>
PGP fingerprint = E8 0E 0D 04 F5 21 A0 94 53 2B 97 F5 D6 4E 39 30
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: