Re: xntp3: init script is not very policy-compliant

To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>
Cc: Branden Robinson <branden@purdue.edu>, submit@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: xntp3: init script is not very policy-compliant
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 16:27:28 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980614162728.Y3613@test.legislate.com>
Mail-followup-to: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>, Branden Robinson <branden@purdue.edu>, submit@bugs.debian.org, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980614141325.1236A-100000@Wakko.ualberta.ca>; from Jason Gunthorpe on Sun, Jun 14, 1998 at 02:14:02PM -0600
References: <[🔎] 19980614090808.J3613@test.legislate.com> <[🔎] Pine.LNX.3.96.980614141325.1236A-100000@Wakko.ualberta.ca>

Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca> wrote:
> You can't background ntpdate, both ntpdate and xntpd can not run at the
> same time, if you load one then the other will fail.

Hm... then I guess it should be done the other way around.

ntpdate will run with xntpd running, I've done this numerous times.
So start xntpd first.

-- 
Raul

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: xntp3: init script is not very policy-compliant
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>

References:
- Re: xntp3: init script is not very policy-compliant
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Re: xntp3: init script is not very policy-compliant
  - From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@gpu.srv.ualberta.ca>

Prev by Date: Re: xntp3: init script is not very policy-compliant
Next by Date: Re: RFC: monitoring maintainers' vacations
Previous by thread: Re: xntp3: init script is not very policy-compliant
Next by thread: Re: xntp3: init script is not very policy-compliant
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread