Re: Size of a du index for packages (Complete index = 74 K)
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> Yes, we need to have the full listing to take care of all the cases
> out there. Also, as far as I can see, the size was reduced from 9xk
> to 7Xk; and we should ask, is the saving in size worth it? IMHO, a
> 100K du file is way better than I expected (I still am interested in
> seeing how this datum was generated, my off the cuff calculations
> indicated a size several times larger).
I just unpacked each and every Package in hamm/binary-m68k in turn and
run a du on it. :)
The 74 K file will thus only contain directories in the data.tar.gz
files and not config files generated during installation. But the error
per Package should be way less than the 5% extra space per drive one
May the Source be with you.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org