On Fri, May 08, 1998 at 10:03:03PM -0700, Darren wrote: > What is considered polite with packages that don't (seem) to be maintained by > the original author... say a package that came from sunsite that hasn't been > updated since '95 and the email address in the package is no good... > > I'm not really looking for what's legal but what's considered good manners if > you would like to see the program start progressing again?? Well, I've got two such packages, now I'm their upstream maintainer, too. There's a third one but happily some other guys took it. These three packages are different to yours, we're still in contact with the original authors - mainly. Regards, Joey -- / Martin Schulze * joey@infodrom.north.de * 26129 Oldenburg / / No question is too silly to ask, / / but, of course, some are too silly to answer. -- perl book /
Attachment:
pgpZznP39w_oJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature