Re: Packages marked as Obsolete
On Mon, 4 May 1998, Martin Schulze wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 1998 at 09:44:41AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > Hi,
> > While we are talking about obsolete packages, what is the
> > story on these? I mean, I would not like to just remove all the
> > picons packages (why are they marked obsolete)? What about ckermit?
> > How many of these are actually obsolete, and how many just have been
> > yanked from hamm?
> >
> > *** sound Opt gom-x 0.29.10-1.1 <none>
>
> The maintainer has posted something abuot this a few days ago.
I uploaded version 0.29.10-3 (including packages gom, gom-x) to
unstable, frozen yesterday. Thus, gom-x should soon dissappear
from the "obsolete" section.
Btw: It actually has been "yanked from hamm", and is -- of course ;)
-- not obsolete. The new version fixes bugs even in gom_0.29.10-1.1.deb
(which was not yanked...), so I decided to upload all to frozen.
MfG,
--Stephan
o-----------------------------------------------------------------o
| Stephan Alexander Suerken <suerken@fh-worms.de> |
+---------------------------------------------+-------------------+
| Voice: (+49) (6241) 92566-2 | Use |
| WWW : http://www.fh-worms.de/~suerken | Debian GNU/Linux! |
+---------------------------------------------+ Visit |
| Debian-related mail: absurd@debian.org : www.debian.org. |
o-----------------------------------------------------------------o
--
Note: When using "reply" with your mail reader, please check that
the mail address matches one of those given above (some mailers
might not recognize the "Reply-to:"-field but instead use the
"From:"-field for replies, which is not necessarily correct).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: