Apt is cool (yay!) - What about bo?
Hi!
Just installed apt_0.0.8. My impression is that it is significantly faster
than dpkg-ftp. Could be pyschological, though ;)
The default apt sources.list doesn't include a reference to bo - and in any
case, since we're undergoing a symlink transition, I haven't been had bo in
my dselect for a while.
What is the status of bo? Now that frozen is frozen, is it supposed to
contain all necessary packages? Or should we still have bo as a fallback.
The following packages on my system are in bo but not in hamm:
--- Obsolete and local packages present on system ---
----- Obsolete/local Required packages -----
------- Obsolete/local Required packages in section base -------
*** Req base timezone 7.55-2 <none>
----- Obsolete/local Standard packages -----
------- Obsolete/local Standard packages in section admin -------
*** Std admin wg15-locale 2-5 <none>
------- Obsolete/local Standard packages in section libs -------
*** Std libs libbfd2.7.0. 2.7.0.9-3 <none>
[Yay! I have PGP installed.. one step closer to developer registration.. I
hope GNUpg gets going soon tho' - depending on PGP sucks...]
Jules
/----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------\
| Jelibean aka | jules@jellybean.co.uk | 6 Evelyn Rd |
| Jules aka | | Richmond, Surrey |
| Julian Bean | jmlb2@hermes.cam.ac.uk | TW9 2TF *UK* |
+----------------+-------------------------------+---------------------+
| War doesn't demonstrate who's right... just who's left. |
| When privacy is outlawed... only the outlaws have privacy. |
\----------------------------------------------------------------------/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: