Re: Licensing, was elvis package

To: Shaya Potter <spotter@kby.netmedia.net.il>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 1998 12:05:45 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 19980426120545.34702@hazel>
Mail-followup-to: Shaya Potter <spotter@kby.netmedia.net.il>, debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 199804260652.JAA19728@kby.netmedia.net.il>; from Shaya Potter on Sun, Apr 26, 1998 at 09:52:32AM +0300
References: <[🔎] 199804260652.JAA19728@kby.netmedia.net.il>

Shaya Potter <spotter@kby.netmedia.net.il> wrote:
> Probably because it's allowed, doesn't the FSF distribute emacs linked or
> with the ability to link out of the box against Motif?

You're probably thinking of xemacs.

-- 
Raul


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Licensing, was elvis package
  - From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>

References:
- Re: Licensing, was elvis package
  - From: Shaya Potter <spotter@kby.netmedia.net.il>

Prev by Date: Re: Compatibility question
Next by Date: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
Previous by thread: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
Next by thread: Re: Licensing, was elvis package
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread