On Sun, Apr 19, 1998 at 03:02:51PM +0200, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote: > MS> If it is a bug, it seems that it's a bug in mailcrypt or so. Jim > MS> is using mailcrypt, Christian is also using Emacs, dunno with or > MS> without mailcrypt. > > Actually, this is an example message signed by mailcrypt as it comes > in our distributions. Looks fine to me. > Let me know if there's something wrong, why, and how it should be > instead. There's nothing wrong with your mail, my mutt just doesn't recognize it as pgp signed. I have adjusted my preprocessor. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: 2.6.3ia > Charset: noconv > Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.4, an Emacs/PGP interface I wonder why the others have a different title. Regards, Joey -- / Martin Schulze * joey@infodrom.north.de * 26129 Oldenburg / / A mathematician is a machine / / for converting coffee into theorems /
Attachment:
pgptZav1ffcUX.pgp
Description: PGP signature