RE: fltk and XForms compliance
Yes, your right with klyx/lyx stuff.
Michael
--
Dr. Michael Meskes, Project-Manager | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
meskes@topsystem.de | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
meskes@debian.org | 52146 Wuerselen
Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire! | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
Use Debian GNU/Linux! | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
> -----Original Message-----
> From: jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl [SMTP:jdassen@wi.leidenuniv.nl]
> Sent: Friday, April 17, 1998 12:57 PM
> To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Re: fltk and XForms compliance
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 09:48:42AM +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> > That will be a problem with lyx as the upstream side is thinking
> about a
> > switch anyway, but qt is the leading candidate there.
>
> I got the impression that KLyX is a forked version, and that the LyX
> maintianers are trying to make clean up the code to make it less
> dependent
> on a particular GUI toolkit. Can someone confirm/deny this?
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 1998 at 11:56:02AM +0100, Enrique Zanardi wrote:
> > Someone should tell them about GTK, now that version 1.0 has been
> released.
>
> GTK is hardly the only free GUI toolkit. Check out
> http://www.theoffice.net/guitool for an overview.
>
> Ray
> --
> Obsig: developing a new sig
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: