Re: Debian Bug#20445 disagree
> My policy would be that the 2.0 release only contains packages which are
> stable and work with a stable 2.0.x kernel all other packages are moved
> to unstable where the user can choose if they want them or not by grabing
OK, I agree. However, when a release is frozen all the packages in the
distribution go directly to frozen and unstable disappears, at least
while the new unstable is created.
So, my question is: how do I do to keep certain packages in unstable
preventing them to go to frozen?
> This also keeps the distribution as small as possible for the user who
> want a stable system.
> But then I'm just a user and this is someone elses choice.
Maybe our Release Manager (Brian C. White) has something to say about
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org