Re: Building glibc 2.0.7 using hamm
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@worldvisions.ca> writes:
> The point release numbers to 1.9 are _not_ bugfix patch levels, like they
> are for 2.0.x kernels. They're interim releases, like for 2.1.x kernels.
Yes, but they are reasonably well tested. They pass a large
regression test for example. Cyclic does make an effort to release a
new 1.9.x if somebody discovers a serious bug in the current one.
They're not just randomly taken exports from their CVS CVS tree.
Guy
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: