Re: Uploaded libjpeg 6a-11 (source i386) to master
- To: "Meskes, Michael" <meskes@topsystem.de>, 'Mark Mickan' <mmickan@iweb.net.au>, Scott Ellis <storm@gate.net>
- Cc: "'debian-devel@lists.debian.org'" <debian-devel@va.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Uploaded libjpeg 6a-11 (source i386) to master
- From: Raul Miller <rdm@test.legislate.com>
- Date: Fri, 13 Mar 1998 08:52:26 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 19980313085226.31323@hazel>
- Mail-followup-to: "Meskes, Michael" <meskes@topsystem.de>, 'Mark Mickan' <mmickan@iweb.net.au>, Scott Ellis <storm@gate.net>, "'debian-devel@lists.debian.org'" <debian-devel@va.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 11720CEF3853D011AC0C00A024B7A9E11125C2@einstein.topsystem.de>; from Meskes, Michael on Fri, Mar 13, 1998 at 02:19:48PM +0100
- References: <[🔎] 11720CEF3853D011AC0C00A024B7A9E11125C2@einstein.topsystem.de>
Meskes, Michael <meskes@topsystem.de> wrote:
> We could alternatively create a libjpeg-aladdin with the increased
> blocks value. So gs-aladdin would be linked against this library while
> all other programs would use the standard. However, using a shared
> library that is used by just one program isn't a better idea than to
> link that one program statically IMO.
I think in this case it's safe to treat it as a newer version of the
library with a changed interface (should get a new major version
number, but maybe we can't rely on that?).
--
Raul
--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble? E-mail to listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: