[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

user interface feedback



Hi,

	dpkg-get update:
 1) only print when the message has actually changed; that allows one
    to 
         i) scroll back in xterm and see earlier messages
        ii) script this and not have the script file blow up
 2) The waiting for file messages have a newline at the end, and
    scroll things to fast. Thse messages should only be printed once
    per file, and a message should be printed if the file is finally
    retrieved 
 3) Messages like tha above reassuring message should never be
    overwritten; insert a newline character.
 4) the downloading X/Y messages may indeed overwrite each other, but
    the connecting to URN message should have a new lin at the end,
    and so always be visible, and not overridden by the down load
    message
 5) Get:/Packages.gz 'Downloading' 0/328172 The only useful
    information is the 0/328172 part; I suggest you print the urn;
    newline, and the next line has just the size_downloaded/total_size
 6) I suggest that anything apart from the  size_downloaded/total_size
    line should never be overwritten.

	manoj
-- 
 Suppose for a moment that the automobile industry had developed at
 the same rate as computers and over the same period: how much cheaper
 and more efficient would the current models be?  If you have not
 already heard the analogy, the answer is shattering.  Today you would
 be able to buy a Rolls-Royce for $2.75, it would do three million
 miles to the gallon, and it would deliver enough power to drive the
 Queen Elizabeth II.  And if you were interested in miniaturization,
 you could place half a dozen of them on a pinhead. Christopher Evans
Manoj Srivastava  <srivasta@acm.org> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E


--
E-mail the word "unsubscribe" to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST. Trouble?  E-mail to listmaster@debian.org .


Reply to: