Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before freezing Hamm
Santiago Vila <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > The bug system is not a release-specific entity.
> I'm glad to know that you support my idea of removing bugs against
> bugs.debian.org from Brian White's list :-)
That is *not* what I said. Please don't lie.
> > Oh, I see, you can arbitrarily upgrade the status of the bug,
> That bug was reported by me. I think it has important severity.
> This is not the only bug I have reported against bugs.debian.org,
> but I consider it, while not being grave, more important than the
> others. If Ian does not agree, he will be able to change it.
I think you should reread the definition of important. Important
is *not* there as a level between normal and grave, it is there
specifically for bugs that are important enough to stop the release of
hamm. And you are (intentionally or otherwise) misusing it.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .