[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Virtual Packages proposal

Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a <jfs@ieeesb.etsit.upm.es> writes:

> jvm1.0		Java virtual machines (I agree that programs for jvm1.0
> jvm1.1		run with jvm1.1, but not viceversa)

please use long names:

> jdk1.0		Java compiler
> jdk1.1

jdk is more than the java compiler: javadoc, jdb, ...

so let us use the presice name:


there is IMHO no need to use a version number, the language remains
the same, only the libraries are changed and will be changed in the
future ...

And I have a program/package that will need a virtual-machine: iDoc -
search for missing javadoc comments in your source code


Christian Leutloff, Aachen, Germany         leutloff@sundancer.oche.de  
      http://www.oche.de/~leutloff/         leutloff@debian.org      

            Debian GNU/Linux - http://www.de.debian.org/

Attachment: pgpCcyf25CRSi.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: