Re: Virtual Packages proposal
On Thu, Feb 19, 1998 at 01:03:38PM +0100, Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a wrote:
> As it is the proposal now is to add:
>
> vrml-browser Same as www-browser but for vrml (wrl) files.
> Will be used by the packages vrweb and vrwave (which I
> maintain)
But as I asked, does anything need to DEPEND on vrml-browser?
It's all very well to provide something but something else has
to Depend on it for it to be useful.
> jvm1.0 Java virtual machines (I agree that programs for jvm1.0
> jvm1.1 run with jvm1.1, but not viceversa)
I thought we already had java-virtual-machine. guavac suggests
java-virtual-machine, for example. I think I found some package which
provided it when I put in the suggests.
> jdk1.0 Java compiler
> jdk1.1
ANy need to depend: on jdk1.0 or jdk1.1 yet though?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: