Re: List of bugs that *must* be fixed before freezing Hamm
> We've been through this before. It is unrealistic and impractical for
> libc to add a Conflicts: clause for every buggy package out there.
>
> As far as I'm concerned there is an implicit assumption that all
> packages on a user's system are up to date. If a user chooses not to
> upgrade a particular package for whatever reason, he does so at his
> own risk just as if he used 'dpkg -i --force-something'.
I agree.
Brian
( bcwhite@verisim.com )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tired of spam? See what you can do to fight it at: http://www.cauce.org/
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: