Re: Can I divert update-rc.d
In article <email@example.com>,
Michael Alan Dorman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>email@example.com (Miquel van Smoorenburg) writes:
>> For the new /etc/rcS.d/ scheme, I need an update-rc.d that knows about
>> runlevel `S' (the current one only accepts runlevels 0-9). I've already
>> filed a bug report with a patch against dpkg, but I don't think there
>> will be a new version soon. 184.108.40.206 doesn't fix it for example.
>> Would it be acceptable if I included update-rc.d in sysvinit,
>> diverting it from dpkg for the time being?
>Over the next week I intend to work through some of the dpkg
>bugs---specifically, after I did .20, several people pointed out bugs
>with patches that were out there. If your bug has a patch, it'll
>probably be in.
ARgh - I'm sure I reported the bug, and a patch, but I cannot find it
back in the bug system. I probably just sent it to Ian Jackson instead
of the bug system. My fault - sorry, I'll fire up the autolart after
dinner. I'll send in a bug report and a patch right now.
>Is next Sunday soon enough?
Miquel van Smoorenburg | The dyslexic, agnostic, insomniac lay in his bed
firstname.lastname@example.org | awake all night wondering if there is a doG
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .