Re: splitting experimental by arch?
Joey Hess <email@example.com> writes:
> Guy Maor wrote:
> > Probably. I never expected that there would be so many packages
> > there. Some developers seem to think that they should upload packages
> > first to there and then to experimental.
> (^^^^^^^^^^^^ YM unstable here, right)
> Yes, I too had this misconception when I was a newbie developer. Maybe we
> need some documentation added somewhere to discourage it.
Yes, I need to add some stuff to the developer's reference about
things like this.
I once tried to propose one simple rule that a package can't go to
experimental unless there's already a version of it in unstable. I
was extremely surprised at the very negative reaction, and I backed
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .