Re: What's Debian's /usr/src policy
Dale Scheetz <email@example.com> writes:
> If you upgrade to bo's timezone package first then the hamm upgrade will
> On the other hand, making timezones essential would fix the problem. I am
> reticent to do this, as the bo timezone is not essential.
> Timezone when from Essential=yes in buzz and rex, to not being essential
> in bo. If I make timezones essential for the release, and then set it back
> to non-essential later, we will run up against this same problem later?
In my revisions to Craig Sanders' auto upgrade script to make it
work for either rex or bo, I used dpkg --force-remove-essential -r timezone
before installing timezones. I don't like using force, but in this
case it seemed like the best way to go.
> Is there any reason (not related to this issue of "essential") that
> timezones should, or should not, be marked essential?
I can't see any reason, and the fact that timezone in bo was
changed to "not essential" suggests that the maintainer decided the
rex classification was wrong.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org .