Re: Dependency and priority mismatches
Dale Scheetz:>
> On Mon, 19 Jan 1998, Richard Braakman wrote:
>
> > This is the resulting output:
> >
> > Cannot satisfy with standard packages:
> >
> > cvs: dependency zlib1g
> > libc6-dev: dependency kernel-headers-2.0.32 (>= 2.0.32-2) | kernel-source-2.0.32 (>= 2.0.32-2)
>
> At least kernel-headers will need to become standard.
all kernel-headers or just those needed by libc6-dev?
can the distinction be made?
t.aa
--
"All Tiny PCs are [year] 2000 compliant ..." from ad of <www.tinycomp.co.uk>
this is about as good as "all Olivetti PCs are ISO 9000 compliant"
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: