Re: dld, bo-unstable progress
On Fri, Jan 16, 1998 at 09:58:51PM -0800, David Welton wrote:
> > > > > debhelper_0.55bo1_all.deb
> ^^
> > > > Hmmm. What did you have to do to debhelper? It's architecture all
> > > > anyway, ie no binaries. It works just fine on bo anyway
> > > > as far as I can see (with updated fileutils).
>
> > There's still no reason to upload a new one for hamm. If the dependencies
> > need to indicate 5.004 or better then it would be better to file
> > a bug report so it gets fixed in the hamm version too.
>
> I uploaded a 'new' one for bo-unstable, not hamm.
But my question is, how does it different from debhelper_0.55_all.deb?
The hamm one should work without modification.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt, hamish@debian.org, hamish@rising.com.au, hmoffatt@mail.com
Latest Debian packages at ftp://ftp.rising.com.au/pub/hamish. PGP#EFA6B9D5
CCs of replies from mailing lists are welcome. http://hamish.home.ml.org
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: