Re: Why does gcc no longer link .sos with -lc by default?
Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> The difference seems to be that the gcc on the alpha is linking in
> -lgcc -lc -lgcc, where gcc on the i386 is just doing -lgcc twice.
>
> So which is right, and if it's the i386, since moving to gcc-2.7.2.3
> isn't an option for the alphw, does anyone know enough about specs
> files to be able to suggest what should be done about the alpha setup?
Given that the dependency policy requires all executable/libraries to
explicitly depend on libc6, I'd say it's either a bug with gcc (not
likely) of a bug with perl (more likely), as the perl config isn't
deliberately including -lc for the extension build process.
Stephen
---
"Normality is a statistical illusion." -- me
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: