Re: bo-updates packages
> Building two different versions is not a problem, as I
> have hamm on a separate disk (so I can boot either bo or hamm).
> However, the version number needs to be distinct.
>
> So, any ideas? Be gentle, I'm only just beginning to understand the way
> dpkg-buildpackage et.al. work :-)
The received wisdom seems to be that you add ``bo<new-version>'' onto the end
of the existing bo version number
So assuming that the next hamm version going to be
isdnutils_2.1.beta1-17.deb
the matching bo version should be called
isdnutils_2.1.beta1-15bo17.deb
and the pair after that should be
isdnutils_2.1.beta1-18.deb
isdnutils_2.1.beta1-15bo18.deb
This way the bo versions are all guarentteed to be lower than the lowest hamm version.
Cheers, Phil.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: