Re: Perl Police (was Re: Bug#10405: package naming)
Christian Schwarz <schwarz@monet.m.isar.de> writes:
[snip]
> I just had a look at an (old) index file of CPAN. The ".tar.gz" of the
> modules have better names for us, for example: "Date-GetDate-2.00.tar.gz".
> This could easily be converted to "lib-date-getdate-perl_2.00.deb".
Sounds good.
[snip]
> Isn't CPAN split into "sections" (categories)? What about if we pack up
> all modules in a section into a .deb. This would get us (referring to my
> old index file):
>
> lib-perl-core
> lib-perl-development
> lib-perl-os
...
[snip]
I don't agree with this. There are a *lot* of modules on CPAN. Do we
have the entire CTAN in Debian? (Apart from non-free stuff like
lgrind.)
We should probably have more bundling than the packages currently
provide, but it will need a bit of work to do the classification. I
am unlikely to want AppleII::ProDOS installed because I want
Compress::Zlib.
--
Carey Evans <*> c.evans@clear.net.nz
TVNZ: So you can see less of New Zealand on air.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: