Re: libc6

[Francesco Tapparo <cesco@goldnet.it>]

On Jun 11, Michael Meskes wrote
> I've recompiled some programs that use X with libc6 and they run like a
> charm. A few minutes ago I recompiled the latest procps suite for
> testing purposes. For instance xload:
> 
> gauss:meskes 113) ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/xload
>         libXaw.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw95/libXaw.so.6 (0x40010000)
>         libXmu.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.so.6 (0x40065000)
>         libXt.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6 (0x40077000)
>         libSM.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libSM.so.6 (0x400b9000)
>         libICE.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libICE.so.6 (0x400c2000)
>         libXext.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libXext.so.6 (0x400d7000)
>         libX11.so.6 => /usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6 (0x400e2000)
>         libproc.so.1.12 => /lib/libproc.so.1.12 (0x40182000)
>         libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40193000)
>         /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)
> gauss:meskes 114) 
> 
> Michael
> 
> --
> Dr. Michael Meskes, Projekt-Manager    | topsystem Systemhaus GmbH
> meskes@topsystem.de                    | Europark A2, Adenauerstr. 20
> meskes@debian.org                      | 52146 Wuerselen
> Go SF49ers! Go Rhein Fire!             | Tel: (+49) 2405/4670-44
> Use Debian GNU/Linux!                  | Fax: (+49) 2405/4670-10
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From:	Francesco Tapparo [SMTP:cesco@goldnet.it]
> >Sent:	Wednesday, June 11, 1997 1:29 PM
> >To:	debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> >Cc:	Die Adresse des Empfängers ist unbekannt.
> >Subject:	libc6
> >
> >Hi,
> >I'm working on the xdaliclock package, and I will take it to libc6. I have
> >merely recompiled it, and all has worked fine, except perhaps some warning
> >(perhaps present with libc5: I have not installed alt-libc5 as yet). This is
> >suspect to me, because my X libs are compiled with libc5, and in this list
> >I've read that ncurses (simpler than X libs) give problems with libc6 
> >in compile time. Perhaps I'dont have understand well the problem: can you
> >explain it to me?

there is a risk that at runtime xdaliclock will broke sometime? If so, the
better upload is to unstable or to project/experimental?

ciao
Francesco Tapparo
cesco@goldnet.it


--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org . 
Trouble?  e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .