Re: Kernel 2.0.30 a bad choice for 1.3
efraim@desire.camelot.de (Alexander Koch) wrote on 24.05.97 in <[🔎] 19970524225430.14489@desire.camelot.de>:
> Quoting Kai Henningsen (kai@khms.westfalen.de):
> > Oh, I give in. There really is no excuse.
>
> There is.
No.
> 2.0.30 has some problems, undoubtedly. I don't know if they're all fixed
> with 2.0.30-6 (it works perfectly fine here) but a usual 2.0.30 is poison...
Note that I did _not_ say "ship anything except 2.0.30".
If we want to ship another version, that version should include the (well,
a) SYN patch. And the PING patch, incidentally.
MfG Kai
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org .
Trouble? e-mail to templin@bucknell.edu .
Reply to: