Re: Bash 2.0 Problems
On 1 Mar 1997, Guy Maor wrote:
> I would prefer to go with bash 2.0 in Debian 1.3. In lieu of a
> working Breaks line, I can check for important programs which break in
> the bash preinst, and refuse to install. Should I do this? So far, I
> know of dpkg 1.4.0.8 and sysklogd 1.3-14.
I'd prefer this solution, overwise 1.3 won't have tetex, won't have
bash2.0, ... If something is _really_ broken it shouldn't be released,
but if only 1 or 2 packages are concerned, then I think we should go
ahead.
--
- ** Linux ** +-------------------+ ** WAW ** -
- vincent@debian.org | RENARDIAS Vincent | vincent@waw.com -
- Debian/GNU Linux +-------------------+ http://www.waw.com/ -
- http://www.debian.org/ | WAW (33) 4 91 81 21 45 -
- | Luminy (33) 4 91 82 85 32 -
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: